16
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by Weydemeyer@lemmy.ml to c/bicycles@lemmy.ca

Some background... this summer I'm spending 2-3 weeks with my folks back in my old hometown, and will likely be doing so every summer for the foreseeable future. They have a bike trail that connects to much of the city right in their backyard, so I'd really like to take advantage of that.

However, given that I'm talking about a relatively short amount of time, I really don't want to spend much on a bike that will sit unused for ~50 weeks of the year. I was checking out Craigslist, and was surprised by the number of bikes I saw available for USD$150 or less.

Obviously when buying a used bike at this price, you're making some significant compromises. But I'd like ask, if you all were buying a bike in that price range, what parts / aspects of the bike would you look at in particular? What might be something that would be a big red flag?

I'm capable of doing some basic maintenance and repair if I have a guide, but I'm not capable of doing major fixes.

(and apologies for the North American defaultism in the price range, essentially I'm asking for what you'd look for in an old, used bike that isn't a waste of money but not necessarily something you'd want to ride more than just occasionally, feel free to think of that in your own local currency).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 4 days ago

I'd be looking for disc brakes and a geometry that fit me well.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 days ago

Rim brakes are just as good. Disc brakes are a marketing tool.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 4 days ago

Rim brakes are just as good.

Um ... no.

Having used both, I can tell you there's a huge difference in stopping power and hand effort needed to stop.

There are also a few side benefits such as wheels no longer needing to be perfectly straight in order to prevent brakes from dragging, making it easier to remove and reinstall wheels, and being able to ford through deeper water without getting your braking surface wet.

I guess maybe if you're just puttering around the greenway at walking speeds, then the difference won't be important to you, but there definitely is a big difference. And even if you're not using the bike for anything high performance, it's still good to be able to stop faster, in case some kid runs out in front of you or something. Rim brakes are okay, if that's all you've got. But for the relatively princely sum of $150, I'd expect an upgrade to discs. Hell, my current off-road bike has discs, and I bought that brand new for $200. You should definitely be able to find a used bike with discs for $150. For some old crap with rim brakes, I wouldn't go over $50.

[-] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I would say, though, that disc brakes that have sat for a little while will make an unholy racket as you burn off whatever dust settled on them in your absence.

If I was just leaving a put-around bike in a shed for 50 weeks, I might not want to deal with it.

this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
16 points (94.4% liked)

Bicycles

5759 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you're a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules


Other cycling-related communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS