62

Image transcript:

White background meme with the text "People want to build a massive connected network of driverless cars to 'solve' traffic. Doesn't that sound a bit like giving SkyNet control of all the nukes?"

There are illustrative images of the proposed "network of driverless cars" as well as a menacing image of a terminator robot and an image from a news report about a deadly crash caused by a self-driving Uber.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

Banning human-operated vehicles and private car ownership would be two huge, cultural hurdles to clear. So why don't we do it in two steps? We can ban private car ownership right now to prepare. It would be pretty easy to transition over to everybody driving a vehicle from a car-share system. It could be phased in over time while we're working on perfecting self-driving. We could probably reduce a lot of parking and vehicle demand, too, since private vehicles sit idle over 95% of the time. Then, when self-driving vehicles are ready, the operators of the car-share vehicles would be in position to switch them all over to autonomous mode, en masse.

If you think I'm insane to suggest that it's politically feasible to just ban private car ownership, hey, that's exactly the point I want to make.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I feel like we could do driverless buses right now if they had dedicated right of ways.

That's another two step item where we could do the first step because we feel good about the way the tech is trending, and even if the tech fails, oops we only made a better life for everyone with dedicated bus lanes.

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I'd be down for this. Having the dedicated infrastructure would reduce the number of variables and allow the opportunity for sensors along the route for more checks so you don't have to 100% rely on a black-box model. Plus, it solves one of the biggest operating expenses of buses (labor), which would make it much cheaper to run very high-frequency bus services.

As a bonus point, you could make them trolleybuses, so if they do something too crazy, they just lose power and stop.

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
62 points (88.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9631 readers
97 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS