98
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Gsus4@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

An oil embargo, lend-lease over the Himalayas and the Pacific war culminating in Japan's surrender helped China repel Japan a lot more than 20%, but sure "death to murica".

[-] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

but sure "death to murica"

Yes. Now you get it.

[-] zephyreks@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Lend-lease over the Himalayas was rather futile and happened more of political reasons than for strategic value.

As for the embargo? It's a byproduct of US war profiteering given that Japan imported something like 70% of their iron, 80% of their oil, and 90% of their copper from the US in 1939.

The Pacific War is a valid point insofar as it forced Japanese industrial capacity to focus on naval strength rather than land arms, but it's a rather misguided one given that a huge chunk of Japanese forces was stuck in China locked in a stalemate, which made the Pacific Theater far less contested than it otherwise would have been (notably, this meant that Australia was safe from Japanese occupation because Japan lacked the resources to invade Australia).

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
98 points (95.4% liked)

World News

32352 readers
410 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS