362
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Hong Kong must provide an alternative to marriage in order to legally recognise the rights of same-sex couples, the city’s highest court has declared, opening the way for civil unions.

However, it rejected appeals against current laws which restrict marriage to heterosexual couples and refuse to recognise overseas same-sex marriages, despite majority support among the population.

The ruling said Hong Kong’s government was “in violation of its positive obligations” under the bill of rights to provide a legal framework to recognise same-sex couples outside the institution of marriage, and gave it two years to establish a system.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CIWS-30@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Wait until the population declines further and the CCP tightens its grip even more over Hong Kong. I doubt this'll last. It's just how authoritarian communist regimes work. Look at Putin and co. for examples.

[-] Solarius@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago

you guys have a really weird fantasy of what China is actually like

[-] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

China has increasingly gone the direction of official cultural conservatism.

[-] bobman@unilem.org -4 points 1 year ago

Yeah. A lot of people here live in fantasy worlds.

I'm always just laughing to myself whenever I see them speculate wild things like this. They're just not rooted in reality.

[-] Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I'm from Hong Kong. This is reality.

Condescension and smugness doesn't make you sound correct. It just makes sound misinformed and willfully ignorant.

[-] bobman@unilem.org -3 points 1 year ago

I'm from Hong Kong too and he's completely wrong.

Condescension and smugness doesn’t make you sound correct. It just makes sound misinformed and willfully ignorant.

Are you talking about yourself?

[-] Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Spoken like a true pro-CCP mainlander who's mom came over to give birth and reap all the social benefits while actively voting to tear down all the democratic institutions.

[-] bobman@unilem.org -1 points 1 year ago

Nope. I'm none of that. Stop with your assumptions and try again.

Lol, the fantasy worlds on this subreddit. Or lemmy thing.

[-] Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Go back to hexbear or wherever you came from and kindly defederate yourself.

[-] bobman@unilem.org 0 points 1 year ago

Lol, I came from lemmy.world.

[-] Joncash2@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

China allows same sex relationships. This HK ruling actually puts it in line with what China already does for 4 years now.

https://news.cgtn.com/news/2019-08-09/LGBT-couples-in-China-file-for-voluntary-guardianship-J15eC8QcrC/index.html

It's saying HK needs recognition similar to what China already does with mutual guardianship. So your argument makes no sense. As HK is following China on this one.

[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mainland:

An adult with full capacity for civil conduct may, in prior consultation with his/her close relatives, or other individuals or organisations who are willing to act as his/her guardian, determine his/her guardian in writing. The agreed guardian shall perform the guardianship duties when such adult loses or partially loses his/her capacity for civil conduct."

HK:

The ruling said Hong Kong’s government was “in violation of its positive obligations” under the bill of rights to provide a legal framework to recognise same-sex couples outside the institution of marriage, and gave it two years to establish a system.

These are vastly different things.

this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
362 points (98.4% liked)

World News

38824 readers
2531 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS