41
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Godric@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

The take seems to be along the lines of "only a revolution will fix this", and then they don't do a revolution. So while we wait to get that pie in the sky by and by, I'll keep on going for a improvement.

[-] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly it baffles me how all these discussions spiral to focus only on major elections. If you want the system to change, don't wait until you have only the option to vote between lesser and greater evil ffs. You need to work from the roots up if there's to be any change - and the must be done if you want a revolution too! And yet here we are, tons of accounts just whining how you shouldn't vote for evil. No shit, but whatcha gonna do about it, other than let the child raping genocider take over? Encourage people to take action on their local level, don't cry and fight and make even more people disengage with your country's politics

I'm inclined to think there's way too many morons on lemmy since not all of these can be bots or russian shills, can they?! And I'm not usaian so this is 100% just an outsider observations through discussions here. I even actively try to avoid reading these but there's just too many

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

I'm increasingly of the opinion that we're contending with only a few trolls, and A LOT of plants, shills, and bots on that front. Or at least troll-ish people informed by the latter. Point being: to me the sabre-rattling crowd seems heavily astro-turfed to me.

[-] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

Like 2/3rds of Lemmy is unabashed Russian agitprop. The tell is when they blame democrats for things republicans do while deliberately misunderstanding how the federal government works.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 0 points 3 weeks ago

I thought voting blue was gonna fix this?

Were you in a coma 2020 - 22 maybe?

[-] Godric@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

How much of a mandate was blue given in 2020-22? 50+1 in the senate, when 50 republicans opposed green energy and corporate reform, and 1 dem opposed green energy, and 1 dem opposed corporate reform?

Imagine if there were just 1 or 2 more blue senators. Elections matter.

[-] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

There would be one or two more rotating villans.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago

If your claim that that electing the Democrats did nothing, I don't disagree with you.

Imagine if there were just 1 or 2 more blue senators.

I don't have to imagine it - we saw it in 2008. We also saw the same results from the Democrats then, with the same rotating villain play to pretend they had no power. Only difference was it was Lieberman instead of Manchin.

[-] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

People have to actually vote blue first.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 0 points 3 weeks ago

Did you miss out on 2020 or something?

[-] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. Republicans held enough power to obstruct the government like they do, and you fell for them blaming Dems like you do.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 1 points 3 weeks ago

People have to actually vote blue first.

Democrats won the Presidency and both houses in 2020. So obviously people did vote blue.

Your response is to then say that doesn't matter, and we can't blame the poor Dems for that.

Unless your point is to state there's no point to voting for the Democrats, but you think they mean well, you're contradicting yourself.

[-] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

So you're gonna pretend the republican party isn't actively obstructive to the point the only way the Democratic party platform passes legislation is with a supermajority while asking why they weren't able to do something they didn't have the numbers to do in the first place. Bad faith or ignorance, your argument is built on a false premise.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 0 points 3 weeks ago

Hey my little 7th grade civics students, how many votes would removing the filibuster require?

the only way the Democratic party platform passes legislation is with a supermajority

So again, your argument is that voting for Democrats is a waste of time? Because that's what you keep saying here.

[-] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

You just keep doubling down on your social media understanding of politics don't you?

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 0 points 3 weeks ago

You mean that 50 votes plus VP was enough to remove the filibuster, had the Democrats wanted to?

I keep doubling down on facts. I'm sorry that those are not supporting your fantasy world where you, the enlightened centrist, are proven right.

[-] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

They want a collection of people that don't want to die in a stupid civil war to die on the front lines of a civil war. They don't want it to be optional.

If they could, they'd be the blocking detachment shooting deserters, screaming "shitlib" as they blow people's brains out of their skulls.

this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
41 points (91.8% liked)

Political Memes

11863 readers
737 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS