Without writing a thesis and deepdiving into his rhetoric - He's not a philosopher, yet often makes references to well known philosophical platitudes from people like Gödel in efforts to argue conservative and religious viewpoints. For example: Argument on Existence of God Notice how he takes a common sense observation, and then applies it to an idea. That's okay, your supposed to do that. My issue with him is that he then makes another assumption, then another...then another. And soon, he's making conclusions built upon a shaky bridge of assumptions that lead back to a small kernel of actual wisdom.

If your paying attention to him, it's very similar to how conspiracy theories are created, you take a solid kernel of truth or seed of wisdom that you can use to anchor the idea....to someone that doesn't know better, that's all they need to believe everything else.

Jordan Peterson is not always wrong, I think he makes genuine points on some subjects when it's based on his actual areas of expertise, but he's sort of a smart sounding jack-of-all-trades when it comes to anything else. For example, he's a psychologist....why did he come up with an all/mostly-meat diet? Because it worked in a niche case with his daughter? It's entirely anecdotal, not researched, divergent from common sense dietary advice, and frankly dangerous.