61
How bad is the software engineering job today?
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
61 points (96.9% liked)
Asklemmy
54391 readers
308 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
So I'vw never used a linter that generates code. I've used them to enforce code styles but never to generate code. And code generation isn't really the point there.
Second. AI isn't replacing devs? The massive layoffs in the tech sector would disagree. Its also not "dogshit apps". Google claims 90% of their code is generated and Microsoft claims 30% both come coupled with massive layoffs. To be fair Microsoft is kinda dogshit and Google search sucks now. But googles apps remain higher quality.
If the centrist argument is just to shrug and say "I guess we're stuck with it". I guess I'd say you aren't a centrist and are a tacit supporter of ai.
I didn't say AI isn't replacing devs. I specifically mentioned stuff like Claude code and people that generate complete apps from AI. That work is dog shit. Using it as a glorified search engine is not the same thing. You're strawmaning this argument by selectively picking words without context from my response. Debate in good faith or don't respond.
Its not like you can have one without the other. But I've found that people demanding responses in "good faith" are rarely engaged in it themselves.
The comment you reaponsed to asked why you aren't more angry about it. And you responded in support, without any reason why you wouldn't be mad, and also that it was only taking "bad" jobs.
But I specifically mentioned work at microsoft and Google which aren't "dog shit".
You never asked why I'm not more angry. You stated that you don't understand why people aren't more angry. I also didn't say that it's taking bad jobs, I'm saying people that use it to generate full and or complex apps are creating dog shit work. The product is what's bad.
But even had I said they were bad jobs, I'd argue that both MS and Google are consistently releasing new and worse software specifically thanks to AI making them dog shit. I'd sooner work for Google than MS, but only by a cunt hair.
To address more my anger at AI... The part I hate most is the environmental impact. The water consumption, the power consumption and all of the fallout that comes with that. I hate that it has skyrocketed the cost of computer parts. I hate the people at the top running this whole thing. I also hate that companies are so short sighted that they are trying to replace devs with AI.
I can only get angry at so many things and these days there's a lot to choose from. Yes I'm angry that it's taking jobs, but of everything AI, that's like my 5th concern. I can't stop the tech from being developed and even if every professional dev tried to protest by not using it, it would still be coming because companies are stupid and going to keep throwing money at it. Like is said, my usage of it is extremely light and nothing I do is dependent on it.