57
What's the best way to sideload extensions? (lemdro.id)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by 2kool4idkwhat@lemdro.id to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've wanted to install an extension from outside addons.mozilla.org, but Firefox didn't let me do it

So I've did a small research and looks like there are 3 ways to sideload extensions, but all of them suck

  1. Using FF Developer Edition

In the Dev Edition you can set xpinstall.signatures.required to false in about:config, but the problem is that the Dev Edition isn't as stable as standard FF

  1. Temporarily load the extension

In about:debugging#/runtime/this-firefox you can temporarily sideload extensions, but they will be removed next time you open FF, which is annoying

  1. Modify FF code

Lastly, I found this script which modifies the FF code, but this can break things so I don't want to use it

I'm really annoyed that Mozilla gets to decide which extensions I can install. So... what's the best way to sideload extensions?

Edit: thanks everyone, I'm now using a FF fork (Librewolf) which lets me sideload extensions after disabling xpinstall.signatures.required

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 6 points 2 years ago

Oh and also, if you wait just a bit, every extension can be made compatible with Firefox for Android: https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2023/08/10/prepare-your-firefox-desktop-extension-for-the-upcoming-android-release/

Of course the developer will still need to make sure that it works on Android.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

Wait, so will this still require creating your own collection, or are they totally opening it up? I read the link, but I'm not sure I understand it.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Totally opening up, as I understand it. Which doesn't mean that you can install every extension, because many might not be compatible. For example, Sidebery isn't really useful on mobile, and other extensions (especially the ones still using "Manifest V2") can't deal well with Android unpredictably killing extension processes in the background. But every extension developer can make their extension installable by Firefox for Android users.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

People will understand that not everything is compatible, but this is still going to make it much less clunky to run add-ons that aren't readily available now. The previous method of having to create a collection was extremely clunky and often felt like more trouble than it was worth.

[-] Vincent@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago

Yep, absolutely! Just wanted to make sure I wasn't interpreted incorrectly :)

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
57 points (98.3% liked)

Firefox

20329 readers
102 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.

Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner

Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
k_o_t@lemmy.ml
golden_zealot@lemmy.ml