486

(Extra images in this post)

Intermediate source (reddit frontend)

Cannot access original source

TranscriptTumblr post by trippedintoa-volcano:

Imagine that everywhere in the mechanical engineering world suddenly got infatuated with lasers.

Lasers have a lot of uses! Measuring things, heating things, cutting things, entertaining cats, particle physics. Lasers are pretty cool. Very versatile, very useful, potential to be very powerful.

Someone shows up one day and says "I have developed a never before seen technology! I call it a Death Star."

And it's a 3.4mW laser. Well no, we haven't seen this exact size of laser much since that's not really standard, but that's a bit of a misnomer, and I wouldn't call it new -

"HOLY SHIT GUYS! This Death Star is so entertaining! My cat loves it and it has such a nice color!" The Death Star becomes a viral novelty, and is mildly entertaining, as laser pointers often are.

Somehow, seemingly overnight, this leads to mania. "Lets stick lasers in EVERYTHING! The public loves them!"

More companies make 3.4mW lasers to jump on the bandwagon. Everyone that makes anything vaguely mechanical starts sticking lasers into their designs.

Everyone is calling them Death Stars. Any time there is a "Death Star innovation", it is just that they made a bigger laser.

Ford's next truck comes out and it has "Death Star integrated headlights", where they have just stuck giant lasers in place of their previously functional headlights.

An electric toothbrush is now "Powered by Death Stars" and shoots a laser at the tooth its cleaning. You think that maybe this could have actual applications as a sanitizing device if you're being generous, but when you actually look at the product, its laser has no purpose but to point at the tooth and drain the battery.

Mechanical products across the board get noticeably worse as everyone starts stuffing lasers in places where lasers have no right to be.

The lamp business gets in on it. "Here's a Death Star powered lamp!" These guys haven't even tried to stick a laser in their damn lamps. They've just started calling their light bulbs Death Stars and hoped you bought it before you could tell the difference. You at least appreciate that they haven't ruined their lamp about it.

Death Stars are lauded as the solution to all the world's problems. If it's not working, you should stick a laser in it! That'll fix it, everyone says. Once in a blue moon, it's even true! Weather prediction is really good now. But most things are garbage. Like "Death Star powered washing machines". What the fuck does that even mean?

Meanwhile, since all functioning mechanisms are being replaced with lasers, problems start showing up. All mirrors now cost $1000+ dollars, because the whole supply is being used up to make more lasers. The earth heats up, because everyone's blasting lasers at everything. People keep going blind, on account of all the lasers.

You, in fact, study optical mechanics. You know what a laser is, and how it works, and that it was invented many years before any of this nonsense actually started. People keep asking you about Death Stars, since surely you must know so much about them.

You explain that this is not really what lasers are for, except you have to call them Death Stars now, and that they're causing a lot of harm, so you don't like them much.

"Oh, but they're still such new tech!" they reply. "They'll figure out how to make Death Stars that don't burn your eyes out soon, and then it won't be an issue anymore!"

Somewhere, deep and buried, you remember lasers being used in particle accelerators, or in telescopes, or in laser cutters, or funny cat videos. They are, in fact, still interesting. Still cool.

But by this point they have replaced roads with "Death Star Powered Pathways", which are just laser pointers propped up on tooth picks pointing vaguely through the forests.

And you think you are going mad.

And they are still just FUCKING LASERS.

 

This post is about Al.

Tags: #scribbles by trip

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

Everybody who contributes to the Torment Nexus thinks they've found the lotus in the swamp.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

The torment nexus analogy is such a thought terminating cliche

[-] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

What? No way. The "Torment Nexus", while being bizarre and thought provoking, is still quite novel - and literally apt. The literal reason it has popped up in culture again is AI being the hot new shit that everybody wants to put in everything and is destroying everything and used for evil, etc etc

I could see the Torment Nexus analogy becoming a TTC if its counter argument wasn't well placed, but it is well placed.

If anything, calling it a ttc feels like a pointless proxy war for the real discussion: whether or not widespread AI infatuation is building the Torment Nexus (overwhelmingly detrimental for the well-being of society) or not.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago

The problem is that the way it's being invoked against Ai is a ttc. There's no dialogue or nuance to be had afterwards, just an "I painted you as the wojak" fullstop. When I make the analogy of someone "sharing open sourced death star cat toys" and your retort is "torment texus!", it is absolutely a ttc!

[-] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Mmmmmm............

Mmmmmmmmmmm........

No. And I'll tell you why. We've now moved to [what a ttc is] as subject, because I think that's important.

I think "Torment nexus" can be used as a micdrop one liner sort of bullshit that people like to do all over the internet, and I do agree that it very likely will be used as that. But I can't agree that it's totally conversation ending in the same way that a ttc is. Because those are like "agree to disagree" or some other actual bullshit that ends thought or conversation.

I think you may be conflating the two.

So, deeming ai as a torment nexus is a real point, with reason, accusation, premises, etc. Like, it's an actual argument, regardless to how inflammatory, right, or wrong it is.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

I still disagree because I don't feel that someone saying "this technology is distilled evil" is open to discussion. For me it reads as a statement meant to end the argument as far as the person saying g is concerned.

[-] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago

"it exists and rich people want it so it's inevitable and you have to get on board" is too

this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
486 points (96.7% liked)

Curated Tumblr

7206 readers
483 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Here are some OCR tools to assist you in transcribing posts:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS