159
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 1984@lemmy.today 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

It's just awful moderation. There is a certain kind of moderator who feels that they need to take action all the time to justify their title, even when the best course of action is to do nothing.

You need to be a calm steady person to do nothing and feel fine with it.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago

Yup, pretty much. It's that dumb enforcement of the rules for the sake of the rules, instead of what they were made for: to ensure the community thrives. In the meantime they turn a blind eye to behaviour that technically doesn't violate rules, but harms the community — it's Charlie mini-modding, Ed showing disdain with "lol" and "lmao", Fran adding noise with that "ackshyually" without addressing the matter at hand…

In Stack Overflow, large subreddits, and some old-fashioned BBC forums all this shit compounds, until the only users "surviving" there sound like pieces of shit.

this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
159 points (99.4% liked)

Hacker News

4900 readers
568 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

Source of the RSS Bot

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS