102
submitted 2 weeks ago by Valuy@lemmy.zip to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Here's the thing though, pretty much everything you just said is wrong. It's not that simple if you think of humans as any other animal. Here's a video link that is pretty long, but dives fairly deep into this topic that is massive from a scientific point of view.

https://youtu.be/nVQplt7Chos

[-] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Woah. I don’t have an hour and a half to dissect all the ways an animal with a penis and an animal with a vagina may not fit the standard classifications of male and female. Not discrediting that there are so many different life forms out there that can’t possibly just be two categories, but you also can’t say that “pretty much everything I said is wrong.” If I wanna breed dogs, I’m gonna need two types of genitalia. Elephants? Same. Salmon? Ducks? Lots of animals can be classified in that way. Not all their characteristics, but their reproductive traits for sure.

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah but toilets and changing rooms aren't for reproduction.

If you go entirely by who has a penis or not, at least you allow some post operative trans people to live freely, but I'm not going to be checking any genitals at the toilet door, nor doing any blood tests for that matter.

This guidance deliberately leaves trans people with two bad options: go in one toilet and be harassed or attacked for being trans or go in another and risk being attacked legally.

[-] powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 weeks ago
[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Tell me you didn't watch the video without telling me you didn't watch the video. This cringey war against facts you're waging is why people talk shit about you when you're not around.

And no it's not "cAuSe ThEy ArEn'T bRaVe EnOuGh To SaY iT tO mY fAcE!" It's because you're exhausting.

[-] powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 weeks ago

Insults don't change the fact that it's a shit video

[-] MissingInteger@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Colin M. Wright, the author of the book you linked, is an "anti-transgender activist". Here is a nice collection of his bigotry.

[-] powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 weeks ago

🤦🤦🤦

That's not a book, that's a peer-reviewed paper published by a PhD Evolutionary Biologist in a journal specific to the topic. Nobody in the field has published a response disputing it, because he's right.

If you don't like being told the truth by him, take your pick of anyone else listed here that signed a statement affirming the same thing:

https://projectnettie.wordpress.com/

Fuck's sake. Reality isn't transphobic. Do better.

[-] MissingInteger@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Reality isn’t transphobic, but that guy definitely is.

Also I’m not discussing sex in humans with you again. I and many people, who’re are way more knowledgeable, have wasted hours of their life doing that. Much less under a post about a stupid bathroom law.


PS: I’m sooo sorry that I said that the piece of written work you linked to was a book.

[-] powerstruggle@sh.itjust.works -2 points 2 weeks ago

You've wasted hours of your life being wrong. Please do better

[-] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

"Why there are exactly two sexes" - what an irrelevant point. Here you are, as usual, turning up in a story about trans people to start another stupid debate about your favourite topic - the definition of the word sex. You always love to bring up your hero Trump's definition of sex and call everyone else stupid.

It's completely and utterly irrelevant. This is about trans people being denied access to toilets. Telling us your pet theories on sex is irrelevant. Not even this transphobic guidance suggests we check someone's gamete size.

You're just a transphobic troll.

[-] edible_funk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That "paper" literally starts off deliberately conflating sex and gender in order to muddy the waters to reframe the conversation. He used a lot of words to essentially define male as "has penis that can go in vagina for purpose of procreation" and female as "has vagina to receive penis for purpose of procreation" (which still wouldn't make sex binary since intersex exist) and had very little to do with biology on the whole.

this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
102 points (97.2% liked)

World News

56429 readers
808 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS