83

Whiny nerds who haven't read a new book in over two decades shed tears over the fact their boring-ass game sucks and is getting swirlied in the toilet bowl by actual cool games

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] himazawa@infosec.pub 29 points 1 year ago

BG3 is unmatchable, not only for hogwarts legacy but for every other game.

Starfield on the other end.. is the same oblivion stuff but in 2023 and without 2023 capabilities

[-] robot_dog_with_gun@hexbear.net 15 points 1 year ago

from what i head the systems are worse than a bunch of their own previous work let alone contemporary products. maybe someday i'll play more than 10 minutes and find out for myself ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[-] danisth@hexbear.net 5 points 1 year ago

I was a fan of both DOS 1 and 2 and I’m finding the systems in BG3 much more fun. I like the action economy of 5e much more than the pips of their earlier games.

[-] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Pretty much. Bet if they re-released oblivion, prior to BG3, it'd still roflstomp horkboris legacy

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

and without 2023 capabilities

They've gotta rewrite the engine from the ground up if they want to bring it up to modern standards. There are fundamental problems with it at its core that can't be resolved without a rewrite that addresses limiting decisions that were made with its overall design a very very long time ago.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

Gamebryo really needs to be thrown in the trash. It's just absurd that they're still using it. They don't even have to, can't they use the Idtech engines?

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Idtech engines

I suspect that ID lost one of their most important people when Steven Ash died, this man has consistently had a hand in projects that have turned into cult hits or very high quality games in some way and I don't think that's a coincidence, I think they were probably highly influential on every single team they were on. I would be very tentative about assuming ID's work maintains the current quality without him.

[-] himazawa@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

You are right, they should rewrite the engine, but they didn't and they preferred enforce the development on the re-re-re-re-re release of titles like skyrim for every possible platform on the plant.

Look at what Larian did instead.. Took 6 years, added beta access and listened to the players. BG3 is far from being bug-free or "perfect" but they released a game that give almost total freedom on how you can play it, and doesn't feel like you are on rails every time.

The problem is bethesda and others "AAA" software houses for years just did the lazy job and now that a software house showed what 6 years of real development should look like everyone is doing the Pikachu face and crying because "We don't want BG3 to set a new standard". The issue is us, the players, that keep buying shit for too much money.

[-] Awoo@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

The issue is us, the players, that keep buying shit for too much money.

Randian logic, absolute nonsense.

Entertainment serves as escapism under capitalism and is as much a requirement for people as food. "The problem is people keep buying bad food, not the companies that make unhealthy cheap shit."

As long as people are captured by a system of wage slavery they will be compelled to seek escapism from it for their own sanity. The companies shovelling out dogshit are taking advantage of that, it's not the fault of the buyers, it's the fault of the system. If you gave these companies to the employees making the art instead of shareholders and publishers you'd get work that is a passion instead. The problem is ultimately where power lies in the companies, with the ownership.

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
83 points (100.0% liked)

games

20508 readers
259 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS