162
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] throw4w4y5@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 years ago

remember he only needs to delay until the election. if he’s elected president again then all the consequences go out the window.

[-] qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

That's only true if he can pardon himself for the election interference. That's not going to happen unless they move the case to federal court.

[-] Icalasari@kbin.social 40 points 2 years ago

Not if he goes the Hitler route and consolidates power. Which honestly, I think he and the GoP are planning to do

Will it work is another discussion, but I'm sure this is what he plans to do

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Lots of the "brown shirts" have already been convicted and are sentenced after their actions on Jan 6th.

[-] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago

That happened in the Weimar Republic, too. Hitler wrote Mein Kampf in prison, and plenty of people got arrested for things like the Beer Hall Putsch. Stay vigilant and organized, politically cooperate with anyone who opposes the Republicans, don't take it for granted that the courts will handle this neo fascist ideology for us, you know?

[-] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago

He can't pardon it no matter what court it's in; they're still state charges.

[-] jdsquared@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

I'll explain this I think 45 times in 3 weeks. I wish more people would read.

[-] jdsquared@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Edit. That should be past tense lol. Not editing it for prosperity.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

This is true, but what I have not seen discussed is that the Georgia Pardon and Parole board can consider a request to commute the sentence immediately, and can choose to reduce or eliminate any sentence handed down.

[-] Acronymesis@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

the Georgia Pardon and Parole board can consider a request to commute the sentence immediately, and can choose to reduce or eliminate any sentence handed down.

Thanks, (this is good information to know, but) I hate it.

[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Hmm. I was under the impression that the governor couldn't even pardon someone in GA unless they had served out 5 years of a sentence, thus guaranteeing jail time.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

You're right. A pardon in Georgia cannot even be requested from the Pardon and Parole Board until five years after any sentence is served. Commutation of a sentence is a different thing altogether.

Pardon is "You don't receive any punishment for this crime." Commutation is "After consideration, the sentence you received is being reduced." And in commutation, the sentence can be reduced to zero.

The Georgia Pardon and Parole Board can consider a request for commutation immediately after sentencing, and can commute a sentence immediately, again, that's reducing a sentence, including a 100% reduction.

[-] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Ty for clarifying that for me :)

[-] Endorkend@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Pardoning himself from doing time, doesn't exclude other provisions against a convicted criminal holding office.

A pardon explicitly states you're guilty of the crime you're pardoned for.

[-] negativenull@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago
[-] Endorkend@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Might want to read what you link.

[-] MoreThanCorrect@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

How do you interpret the linked article? To me it read as an essay that argued that pardons neither firmly convey guilt nor innocence because there exists mixed precedence and reasoning for both.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

That’s only true if he can pardon himself for the election interference. That’s not going to happen unless they move the case to federal court.

That wouldn't work either. The first step in a pardon is that the person convicted has to admit guilt to trying to steal the election. If he straight up admits guilt that's clearly a Fourteenth Amendment violation.

[-] ShruberyPanda@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

This is a common misconception. While a pardon does mean some things (like removing your ability to plead the 5th in relation to the related case), it remains very disputed whether it constitutes an admission of guilt:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burdick_v._United_States#:~:text=Although%20the%20Supreme%20Court's%20opinion,by%20the%20recipient%20is%20disputed.

this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
162 points (95.5% liked)

News

35714 readers
691 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS