546
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Knusper@feddit.de 69 points 1 year ago

I'm choosing the third side: WebAssembly

[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 35 points 1 year ago
[-] marcos@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Incredibly powerful type system λλλ

And the best part, those two interop better than in native code.

[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 1 points 1 year ago

those two interop better than in native code

Really? Why is that?

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The wasm ABI allows for a bit more flexibility than the C one.

I'm not sure how much impact it has on practice (probably very little, otherwise somebody would have fixed it), but in native code there's a lot of potential for mismatching behaviors from the two different runtimes.

[-] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 1 points 1 year ago

Oh I had no idea, thanks for explaining!

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 13 points 1 year ago

You can even compile Fortran code to wasm and run it on a web browser. Who need Javascript's puny 64bit floating point precision when you can have Fortran's superior 128bit floating point precision?

[-] Static_Rocket@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Have they finally dumped the required js stub loader?

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

No, but GUI frameworks can generate it for you. Same goes for DOM access, for which there's normally only a JavaScript API.

So, you'll likely want to read JS, when researching what events or properties you can read/write for certain HTML nodes in the DOM, but with a mature GUI framework, you should not need to write any JS.

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
546 points (94.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

19623 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS