3
ich🥵iel (feddit.de)
submitted 8 months ago by Knusper@feddit.de to c/ich_iel@feddit.de
[-] Knusper@feddit.de 75 points 9 months ago

There's a comic, titled "Loss", which is infamous, because it's incredibly fucking depressive. People don't enjoy being reminded of it. And so, of course, it has become an internet culture / meme thing to do precisely that, but in a sneaky way.

In particular, the comic has 4 panels and an arrangement of characters in a certain, recognizable pattern. So, over time, it's been reduced ad absurdum to just this pattern.

Well, and in the meme above, it becomes apparent that it's replicating the Loss pattern, when that fourth panel has the DNA flipped on its side. So, the joke is that we have the pattern-seeking brain for recognizing Loss.

85
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by Knusper@feddit.de to c/askscience@lemmy.world

I often hear science-adjacent folks stating that a tree needs to be 30 years old before it starts absorbing CO₂, usually paired with the statement that it's therefore pointless to start planting tons of trees now for slowing climate change.

Now, as far as my understanding goes, the former statement is very obviously nonsense. As soon as a tree does photosynthesis, it takes carbon out of the air, which it uses to construct cellulose, which is what wood is made of.
Really, it seems like it would absorb most CO₂ during its initial growth.

I understand that it needs to not be hacked down + burnt, for it to actually store the carbon. But that would still mean, we can plant trees now and not-hack-them-down later.

I also understand that some CO₂ invest may be necessary for actually planting the trees, but it would surprise me, if this takes 30 years to reclaim.

So, where does this number come from and is it being interpreted correctly? Or am I missing something?


Edit: People here seem to be entirely unfamiliar with the number. It might be that I've always heard it from the same person over the years (e.g. in this German video).
That person is a scientist and they definitely should know the fundamentals of trees, but it was usually an offhand comment, so maybe they oversimplified.

993
submitted 10 months ago by Knusper@feddit.de to c/technology@lemmy.ml

Solar now being the cheapest energy source made its rounds on Lemmy some weeks ago, if I remember correctly. I just found this graphic and felt it was worth sharing independently.

Source: https://ourworldindata.org/cheap-renewables-growth

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 79 points 10 months ago

Lots of us are from non-English countries...

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 90 points 11 months ago

Kind of feels disparate from it being a video game, but it's difficult to really make this experience another way:

I wanted to play a healer in an MMO. It was a shitty MMO, so healers could only be female characters wearing skimpy armor.

Well, it took about half a minute until I had people walk up to me, to then just stop 3 meters away. From the way they were moving, I have to assume, they were working their cameras to look underneath my skirt, and probably doing so with only one hand.

Some of them were sending me "hello :)" messages, which I guess is basic decency, if you're going to use my body, but it felt weird, too, since we had nothing to talk about.

All in all, it felt uncomfortable. And I did not even have to fear for them to start touching or even raping me. Plus, I was able to log out, delete my account and basically just leave all of that behind.

Well, except for one thing I did not leave behind: I do not want to be the other side in that experience either.

1
submitted 11 months ago by Knusper@feddit.de to c/dach@feddit.de

Gerade beim Einkaufen hat sich ein Seniorenehepaar munter durchgefragt, ob denn schon jemand den Amaretto im frisch umgestellten Supermarkt gefunden hat. Irgendwann wurde auch eine Verkaufsfachangestellte verständigt, die dann leider mitteilen musste, dass der Amaretto bereits ausverkauft ist.

Bei der Kasse habe ich die beiden dann wieder gesehen, wie sie aus ihrer Tasche einen Salatkopf und eine Schale Tomaten auf's Band legen. Muss wohl ein besonderes Salatrezept sein. 🙃

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 107 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can someone explain to me

  1. why the police is at that stadium to begin with?
  2. why that stadium needed to be cleared out?

The bodycam footage looks like everyone was having a good time. So, I'd consider it the duty of police officers to enable everyone to continue having a good time. Asking a band director to cut off a song when there's no emergency is completely ridiculous.

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 101 points 1 year ago

Gotta love these kind of news. There's always these hypothetical discussions of clouds being insecure and companies generally just ignore that, because clouds are theoretically, sometimes cheaper.

And then every now and then, half the internet leaks out of one of these clouds and everyone's like, holy crap, and then companies go back to generally just ignoring that, because clouds are theoretically, sometimes cheaper.

247
me_irl (feddit.de)
[-] Knusper@feddit.de 84 points 1 year ago

In one of the bathrooms at my workplace, the light timer used to be far too short. It reacted to sound, but not very well, so whenever it switched off, you'd hear me clapping my hands like a dumbass.

Then one day, I had a co-sitting with another guy. And of course, the light went out on us. I was already thinking, great, now I'll get to applaud that guy shitting.

But instead, the guy lifted his leg, stomped a single time and the light went back on. That was the day I learnt that I'm a rookie at pooping.

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 159 points 1 year ago

Yeah, inflation rate is high, so central banks are trying to counteract that by basically slowing down the economy, so that our normally scheduled inflation countermeasures kick in appropriately. Well, and the usual way to slow down the economy is to make it more costly to loan money, i.e. increase interest rates. Which means investors can't just pump money into any company anymore, they want that money to actually pay out to cover those interest rates. And that means companies need to actually be profitable to get money to finance their operation.

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 117 points 1 year ago

You mean, like on Ubuntu?

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 176 points 1 year ago

This is specifically Bavaria. They also recently found out that their vice president has a past as a Nazi and the reaction of their president was essentially "Oh no. Anyway...". So, yeah, if you considered visiting the Oktoberfest, maybe reconsider.

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 263 points 1 year ago

What hasn't been said as explicitly yet: It being Chromium-based means there's tons of implementation details that are bad, which will not be listed in any such comparison table.

For example, the Battery Status web standard was being abused, so Mozilla removed their implementation: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/software/battery-status-api-being-removed-from-firefox-due-to-privacy-concerns/
Chromium-based browsers continue to be standards-compliant in this regard.

And this is still quite a high-level decision. As a software engineer, I can attest that we make tiny design decisions every single day. I'd much rather have those design decisions made under the helm of a non-profit, with privacy as one of their explicit goals, than under an ad corporation.

And Brave shipping that ad corp implementation with just a few superficial patches + privacy-extensions is what us experts call: Lipstick on a pig.

401
submitted 1 year ago by Knusper@feddit.de to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Was just trying to explain to someone why everything is going to shit, specifically companies, and realized, I don't fully get it either.

I've got the following explanation. The sentences marked with "???" are were I'm lost. Anyone mind telling me, if they're correct and if so, why?

The past few years, central banks were giving out interest rates of 0% or even negative percentages. Regular banks would not quite pass this on, but you could still loan money and give it back later with no real interest payments.

This lead to lots of people investing in companies. As long as those companies paid out more money than those low interest rates, it was worthwhile. But at the same time, this meant companies didn't have to be profitable, because they could pay out investors from money that other investors gave them???

This has stopped being the case, as central banks are hiking interest rates again, to combat inflation???

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 80 points 1 year ago

For a normal company, that is a perfectly reasonable policy. What's really the outraging part here, is that YouTube holds a monopoly on tons of content.

People feel forced to access YouTube to live their lives, whether that's just to watch entertainment they've followed for a while, or because a colleague sends a link to a YouTube video, or because when looking up stuff, the only explanation seems to be in a YouTube video.

If they could simply go to a competitor with a less shitty app, less awful privacy practices or a more open ecosystem, they wouldn't need to complain about YouTube to begin with.

26
ich🧼iel (feddit.de)
submitted 1 year ago by Knusper@feddit.de to c/ich_iel@feddit.de
53
New ideas using Wayland Input Methods (blog.davidedmundson.co.uk)
submitted 1 year ago by Knusper@feddit.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml
[-] Knusper@feddit.de 169 points 1 year ago

There's been tons of right-leaning Reddit alternatives before, but they always quickly devolved into Nazi spaces.

Lemmy was the first one that I'm aware of, which told Nazis to fuck off right from the beginning.

view more: next ›

Knusper

joined 2 years ago