237

submitted 1 year ago by frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

146 comments fedilink hide all child comments

They were invented decades ago.

They have fewer moving parts than wheelbois.

They require less maintenance.

There's obviously some bottleneck in expanding maglev technology, but what is it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Is that factoring in the always on cooling of the magnets?

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Here's an article about the subject, paper linked at the bottom of the article: https://phys.org/news/2010-12-high-speed-pollute-percent-traditional.html

[-] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thx, as I understand it, this is calculated for traditional railway technology and does not have anything to do with to maglev.

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023

237 points (94.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43965 readers

1256 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS