349
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/pentagon-buys-starlink-ukraine-statement-2023-06-01/

It would appear he had a DoD contract for the service depending on the actual contract he may be in violation.

That said this sub has a serious war hawk problem. Non-interventionism isn't some evil philosophy.

[-] bdesk@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Musk intervening is not non-interventionism.

[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Musk seeking the contract and providing starlink certainly isn't but the broader concept of not providing a good or service of benefit to one side in a conflict is emblematic of non-interventionism. The most true incarnation of non interventionism in this kind of situation would have been to never get involved in the first place.

I'm in no way implying musk isn't and idiot without consistent guiding principles or beliefs.

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
349 points (94.4% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4203 readers
33 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS