59

A UK Member of Parliament recently suggested that there should be a Government minister for men which would presumably do similar things to the existsing minister for Women.

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/reactions-pour-in-as-mp-renews-calls-for-official-minister-for-men-356501/

This has thrown up a series of heated discussions on social media about whether this is part of the 'backlash' against feminsm, or whether there is a legitimate need for wider support of men's issues.

As a man who believes that there are legitimate issues disproportionately affecting men which should be addressed, what I really want help in understanding is the opinion that men don't need any targetted support.

I don't want to start a big argument, but I do want to understand this perspective, because I have struggled to understand it before and I don't like feeling like I'm missing something.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Trebuchet@lemm.ee 54 points 1 year ago

It’s a disingenuous argument. The MP is from the Conservative Party, i.e., the right wing arsehole party.

You may have noticed how the Right Wing Playbook has been imported from America. Increasingly, when things aren’t going politically well, they’ll have a look at the Playbook and pick a Culture Wars trope. This is one such instance, intended only to divide.

[-] soviettaters@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

How is supporting men's mental health and advocating for them in ways they are often overlooked (such as in single fatherhood) bad?

[-] Trebuchet@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago

This is the same difference between Black Lives Matter and All Lives Matter. Nobody is saying that men should not be advocated for, but elevating the issue of men's rights to ministerial level does not help resolve the larger issue of the systemic disadvantage of women in society.

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

It's not supposed to, it's supposed to help issues specifically affecting men.

[-] soviettaters@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

You're right, it doesn't. That's why there's a minister for women.

[-] Trebuchet@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Who's responsibility includes reducing the disparity between men and women. Having a minister for men introduces parity in this regard, which therefore does nothing to advance the interest of women in a male dominated system

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
59 points (76.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43890 readers
1632 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS