406
What do you mean mechs are non-credible? (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 years ago by PugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/noncredibledefense@lemmy.world
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Didn't the original tabletop BT rules allow for mechs to lie prone for better accuracy and defense? And mechs that didn't have arm actuators had a penalty to standing back up?

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
406 points (97.4% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4187 readers
8 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and a sexual craving for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
PugJesus@lemmy.world
PugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com