606
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's pretty reasonable not to implicitly trust an organization to always get things right or always be honest about what they are doing. Couldn't there be theoretical value in spreading backups across multiple organizations and having cryptographic evidence they are all doing their jobs correctly, to reduce the need for that trust?

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Theoretically? Sure. But in reality, blockchain pushers are fanatics, scammers, or both, so no real organization should trust them.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 year ago

IMO that's a pretty limiting perspective. The existence of a lot of noise around a technology isn't a great reason to take a hard stance against ever using it.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If you think you've found the one honest snake-oil salesman, you're almost certainly wrong. That's part of reality.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can agree that it's a bad idea to trust a salesman trying to market a blockchain product or service, but part of the point of open standards and techniques is that you can evaluate them on their own merits and implement them without needing to trust anyone.

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
606 points (96.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

32490 readers
701 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS