198
submitted 2 years ago by grte@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 57 points 2 years ago

Queen Elizabeth was a good place to stop.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

What seems likely to me is slowly changing things bit by bit. I don't think the UK would mind either, it's just a matter of spending time and effort (and money) making those legal changes.

The final constitutional change seems unlikely anytime soon. It's very unlikely that all the provinces will agree to play ball and get it done unless there was an urgent need to get rid of it.

[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

unless there was an urgent need to get rid of it

Darn it the wrong royal went to Epstein's Island.

[-] gruvn@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Whether or not the UK would mind is irrelevant. Much like the monarchy. LOL

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

My point is that people aren't opposed to ditching it, it's the logistical issues

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

1602? Like, around the time of the founding of Québec?

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
198 points (97.1% liked)

Canada

8706 readers
1411 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS