585
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by cacheson@kbin.social to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It just bothers me how much more effort simple tasks take on Linux

Such as? I've never had this problem.

[-] Alpharius@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

It depends of what distribution and overall understanding the mentality being the how to install thing stuff. Most people don't know what's a package manager for example, how to manage multiple disks on the computer etc... While some linux distros are streamlined and made simple, they can feel quite different to windows.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago

You don't just download an installer, go to the folder, click an icon with some associated details, and have warnings about the sort of modifications the program might make when installed. No, you have to learn the command line for this task and sometimes you need to know what parameters to set, and in the case of dependencies you should probably keep track of what all it comes with and what they do because when it comes time to remove a program it'll be even more tedious. If it takes time then it is work, and Linux is more work.

[-] LudOuO4@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think most distros have a command to remove orphaned packages. If you just don't want to use the command line but want a more App store like experience, then there are some distros that do have a GUI based app store. I think you should try dual booting with something like Pop_!OS when you want to try it. Absolutely do not install it in place of windows the first time, because you might not like it, and dual boot gives you an option to remove it and go back to windows like nothing happened. Then ofc if you don't want to try it then don't.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

Oh god no, App stores are cancer. I just want files in folders. Easily identified formats like executables or media. I'm sure theres one right for me, but it's not like it cost me anything to use the Windows LTSC.

[-] LudOuO4@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Well, linux executables and 3rd party installers exist, but they are not the recommended way to install software, and linux uses the same formats as windows for almost everything(mp4, txt, rtf, etc...). But you should probably stick with windows if you want that UX.

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
585 points (88.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21281 readers
713 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS