56
submitted 1 year ago by MrPhibb@reddthat.com to c/usa@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] worfosaurus@lemmy-api.ten4ward.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd be down with that, FartsWithAnAccent! But the constitution would have to be updated with that clause. Right now, it just says that they have to do a thing without specifying what happens if they don't do that thing

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Or they could just be held in contempt of court because it was a court order that that blatantly disregarded.

Unfortunately they were only ordered to draw a new map, which they did. So they did indeed "comply". The court can't tell them how to draw the map, only that it needs to be redrawn.

It's not a particularly smart system

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
56 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7166 readers
953 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS