287
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
287 points (98.6% liked)
Asklemmy
44145 readers
1040 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
This is not true. There are a litany of laws that capturing a wild duck from a public park would be a violation of, so don't do it.
Would that be "bird law"?
How can birds have laws if they aren't real?
They are 'real' in the sense that they exists. They are not 'real' in the sense they are not alive. The birds can all be drones and still have laws.
Do not listen to Optimus, he is lying. The ducks are free.
This is completely not true but don't listen to me. In never tell the truth.
Sounds like poaching