631
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 85 points 1 year ago

Failed it three times, finally succeeded at the age of 34, just a few months before the election that put her in the House.

She also married a (somewhat rich) sex offender. But has now divorced him in favor of a guy who was groping her in the theater she was kicked out of. She was also giving him a handy.

[-] Specific_Skunk@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

A suggested edit:

But has now divorced him in favor of a Democrat-aligned LGBTQ-supporting, drag show-hosting bar owner who was groping her in the theater she was kicked out of. She was also giving him a handy.

This brings me joy and I want to make sure her support network is fully aware of it.

A link to what I’m sure is a trustworthy source: https://www.tampafp.com/colorado-rep-boebert-apologizes-for-theater-behavior-now-faces-questions-on-boyfriends-background/

[-] OrangeJoe@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

Like, I agree with you. But you know her supporters either don't care or will come up with some crazy way to justify it.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Of course she should give him a handy in a theater! Women exist as sexual objects to serve men at all times! It would have been morally wrong for her to not have greased his pole!

Western slope Republicans, probably.

[-] akai@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

They'll probably say that a filthy Democrat was fondling her...

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago

I love that she was jerking him off in the theater, like she was some kind of raunchy teen from the 50s or something, and not, you know, a 36 year old grandmother.

[-] DeanFogg@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

That should have been the headline. 36 y/o grandma Lauren Bobhead jacks boyfriend off in theater

[-] Cabrio@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Should have, but there's no teeth in Liberal media.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 year ago

You do know that is a good thing right?

We don't need the rhetoric of us-vs-them.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl -1 points 1 year ago

No one's saying we have to twist the truth, but if you think the "big tent" collective of Independents & Democrats are as adept at Messaging as Fox News, Glenn Beck, Joe Rogan, Facebook, Twitter/X, conservative radio, and conspiracy websites...

You are almost enough out-of-your mind to join them. Yes, we need to be tougher on them, but the "mainstream media" doesn't work for Democrats, they work for clicks and views...

[-] vind@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

They will use that as a way to claim that he is the one 'corrupting' her sexually...

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It is amusing to think that they would not drop her for so many other things (vaping in public, groping in public, being a complete Karen in public), but associating with a Democrat ? That's a bridge too far, buddy!

[-] torknorggren@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

I thought the sex offender wasn't remotely rich until he mysteriously landed some sweetheart contract a couple months before Bobo was elected.

[-] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I think he might have been an oil worker of some sort which are usually pretty well paid. The real money comes from his $500k/yr oil "consulting" job he got after she was elected, and is definitely qualified for

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

he also owns a LGBTQ bar or club which she claims to be against.

On May 31, Boebert claimed children at a North Carolina school were being taught colors from an "LGBT flag flashcards with a pregnant man," adding: "We went from Reading Rainbow to Randy Rainbow in a few decades, but don't dare say the Left is grooming our kids!"

On June 6 she said: "Take your children to CHURCH, not drag bars."

On August 18, Boebert tweeted a photograph showing an advert for a "Drag Queen Story Hour," hosted in a public library.

She added: "Sending a message to all the drag queens out there: stay away from the children in Colorado's Third District!"

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl -1 points 1 year ago

Sorry, I'm practically staggered by all the Family Values these Republicans believe in and display...

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
631 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19104 readers
1966 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS