631
Biden Mocks House Republicans Over Impeachment Inquiry: ‘Lots of Luck!’
(www.mediaite.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
631 points (97.7% liked)
politics
19088 readers
1683 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I feel that would validate the republican clown show too much.
Yep. They go out of their way to make words lose meaning. Notice after Jan 6 they've been labeling anything dems do as an "insurrection." It's so their base sees anything horrendous that Republicans do as tit for tat, and the dumbass enlightened centrists can say "bOtH sIdEs" as they do.
Saying "OK go for it you got nothing" is much better optically.
Reflexively downvoting anyone conflating "both sides", "enlightened centrists" etc. Whole system is a disaster and sick of people acting like the "oppression lite" party is off limits for criticism. Anyone who doesn't just compromise their principles to go with the flow politically knows better.
If people who disapprove of fascism don't vote, well then, we get fascism.
Doesn't matter if you think it's not your fault; we still get fascism.
Doesn't matter if you say the whole system is a disaster; we still get fascism.
Doesn't matter if you pinky-swear to go punch a Nazi instead of voting; we still get fascism and you go to prison.
I promise you, the fascists will show up and vote for fascism.
Personally, my principles say "fascism is bad, let's not have one of those" and I don't believe in compromising on that.
Yes, the classic "lesser of two evils" stance to justify an arbitrary formation of social support behind "literally anything better than the worst possible thing". And in this context right now, actually being used to shut down all criticism of anything besides the "worst possible thing". No awareness at all about all the other better alternatives. You could actually prove that this mentality drives the status quo further towards "fascism" or any other negative totalitarian outcome, because you're specifically forbidding criticism of what's going wrong with who you support.
It is not a well thought-out stance.
Yes but also every accusation is a confession with them, they’re screaming about a laptop while handing out security clearances to their kids and quietly funneling Saudi money all over. Let’s look at that more publicly