1539
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Grayox@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] qooqie@lemmy.world 112 points 1 year ago

The only way for libertarianism to work is if every human had only good intentions. Since that’s simply never going to happen libertarianism will never work. Just my opinion feel free to disagree.

[-] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 58 points 1 year ago

Libertarianism is a theory espoused to those with good intentions by people that have bad intentions.

It doesn’t work for almost anyone. But it super works for some. That’s the point.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] idunnololz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The problem is that it doesn't work even if everyone has good intentions. It needs everyone to agree on what "good intentions" even means.

[-] Kalcifer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I think you are possibly confusing libertarianism with anarchism. Libertarianism does not make the argument that the state is well functioning without a central authoritative mediating body -- I point you to the model of a Nightwatchman State.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

I personally don't fully agree. Libertarianism just doesn't work at all. It is not even a complete system from a logical sense. It falls apart when faced with basic scrutiny, or they just theorize a system that's basically the same as a central government but with a private entity name stamped on it.

It is an ideology stemming from a basic principle, but they sadly don't seem to think of the entire system as a whole.

load more comments (5 replies)

Also there's the fact that nearly everybody's idea of freedom is drastically different and some people's freedoms infringe on others.

[-] Kalcifer@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Also there’s the fact that nearly everybody’s idea of freedom is drastically different

Libertarianism seeks to maximise freedom.

some people’s freedoms infringe on others.

Libertarianism does not, in any way, shape, or form, advocate the idea that one is able infringe on the rights, and freedoms of another without their consent. One should not be allowed to impart a cost on another without their consent, or proper compensation for damages.

What if you think you should be able to enjoy peace and quiet and your neighbour wants to play loud music constantly?

Who’s freedoms do you infringe so the other one can have theirs?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (64 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
1539 points (91.9% liked)

Memes

45660 readers
636 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS