85
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
85 points (96.7% liked)
Creepy Wikipedia
5090 readers
1 users here now
A fediverse community for curating Wikipedia articles that are oddly fascinating, eerily unsettling, or make you shiver with fear and disgust
Guidelines:
-
Follow the Code of Conduct
-
Do NOT report posts YOU don't consider creepy
-
Strictly Wikipedia submissions only
-
Please follow the post naming convention: Wikipedia Article Title - Short Synopsis
-
Tick the NSFW box for submissions with inappropriate thumbnails.
-
Please refrain from any offensive language/profanities in the posts titles, unless necessary (e.g. it's in the original article's title).
Mandatory:
If you didn't find an article "creepy," you must announce it in the thread so everyone will know that you didn't find it creepy
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They had moral duty, but apparently not legal duty. I see nothing wrong with this ruling, if this is what the law says.
Actually I found this:
https://www.officer.com/home/news/10877921/judge-rules-that-alameda-calif-police-had-no-legal-duty-to-aid-drowning-man
The reporting is a mess though. Hard to know exactly what happened.
Yep. Has been case precedent since 89' ya dummies. DeShaney v. Winnebago. No duty to protect legally speaking.