486
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

McDonald’s is being sued over a hot coffee spill, again.

This time, a San Francisco location is being accused of serving a “scalding” cup of coffee with an improperly attached lid, which allegedly resulted in the coffee pouring out on plaintiff Mable Childress’ body and causing “severe burns” after she tried drinking it.

The lawsuit, filed last week, alleged that the elderly woman is suffering from “physical pains, emotional distress and other damages.” The restaurant’s negligence was a “substantial factor” for her injuries, it alleged.

Childress also said in the lawsuit that the restaurant employees “refused” to help her, a point that the McDonald’s denied.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 20 points 1 year ago

The real question is why would anyone still get coffee at McDonalds?

[-] Poob@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Up in Canada (at least my part), McDonald's coffee is a great affordable coffee. It's better than Starbucks or (🤮) Tim Hortons. It's not going to compete with a bespoke artisan coffee shop that squeezes cat butt glands or whatever justifies selling a $5 cup for $10, but it's better than almost everything else for the price.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah I read that is a common option. Can't believe that from where I'm from, decent coffee joints are all over. Nobody I know would go to McDonald's for coffee

[-] tooclose104@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

The town I live in has 2 Tims, 1 McDonald's, and no cafes. I never considered how deeply it would eventually hurt leaving a place with quality cafes and restaurants for a place without. At this point we're considering on just moving to an unorganized township because there's no point in paying the higher property taxes (there's a long list of complaints to go with that nugget).

[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

coffee shop that squeezes cat butt glands or whatever justifies selling a $5 cup for $10

The cost is twofold, justified by having:

1- actual quality cherries, grown and dried in a labor intensive ways by farmers actually making real money directly off of the sale of their coffee and-

2- small, local coffee Roasters actually taking care of the roast on a coffee you want to taste while also getting paid for their hard work.

That probably sounds fucking snobby as hell but it really makes a difference that is hard to ignore once you start tasting it.

No butt glands involved, feline or otherwise.

[-] dezmd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

The real takeaway issue is $10 for a $5 cup of $.11 cents worth of ground coffee beans.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 year ago

It's fairly cheap for getting coffee out and it's better than Starbucks coffee. Sure, go to a cafe if you have the means, but many don't.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

This is quite a common answer. It seems like a virtual thing. In Europe there are many coffee cafes that aren't much more expensive then Mac Donald's, si I wouldn't even think of going there.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the US general has a lack of cafés. I imagine there are two reasons. First is the culture doesn't really encourage it (though that's mostly newish, and has to do with the second point). Second, the sprawl, especially in suburban hell, does not allow for many third places at all. There's almost nowhere people go to sit around and relax outside of their house. It's a real shame and I think it's caused a lot of issues.

[-] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

You can usually get it for a dollar with the app and it's better than a lot of the stuff that can be made at home with an automatic coffee maker. I used to get it a lot until I could afford to support smaller coffee places

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Big doubt that it's better than almost anything you can make at home with an automatic coffee maker. It's awful. The convenience is the only reason.

[-] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We must've had different experiences with it. I also wouldn't say it's better than almost anything you can make at home with an automatic coffee maker - just a lot of it. I'd take it over any of the more common supermarket brands of coffee grounds (Folgers, Starbucks, Great Value, Dunkin, Peet's, and Maxwell House in particular)

[-] Astronautical@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

I concur to this; I used to work at McDonald's, and we only changed out the coffee like twice a day if that

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago
[-] TronnaRaps@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

At least in Toronto, it's one of the better options.

[-] Leviathan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Montreal too. Before I got into specialty coffee (which is altogether another thing) I was pretty much only drinking mc-d's in the mornings. There's no real grocery store option for at home pour over that compares either.

[-] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Last time I visited the US, McDonalds and Dunkin' Donuts was easy places to get coffee on the road that wasn't see through, like pure water, or tasted like shit

[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

As far as widely available (especially in BFE where it's this or a shitty gas station) it's decent coffee. I'd say it's better than Starbucks, mostly because Starbucks coffee is terrible. Almost no big chain gives you coffee worth the $5 of whatever they charge.

this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
486 points (96.0% liked)

News

23301 readers
1211 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS