513
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
513 points (98.3% liked)
News
35714 readers
744 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What the hell is with these shitty judges not doing their jobs? They've been warned. The next step is not to warn them again, it's to file sanctions.
Judges will often bend over backwards to limit the possibility of a successful appeal. They don’t like having an appeals court overturn a verdict since it means they would then have to retry the entire case again.
By giving the defense multiple warnings they’re effectively preventing them from using this instance as a credible argument in an appeal. In an appeal the defense might say something like “the judge unfairly ruled against me regarding X”. But the appellate court will see in the transcript that the judge issued multiple warnings before ruling on X and use that to reject the claim.
I like your rationale here. It's a good reason and it makes sense. Thanks for that
I don't like the part that it's taken the justice system 30 years to start dealing with this clown. If it were anyone else....
Do you mean shitty lawyers?
There's a slate of judges who are refusing to do their jobs. There shouldn't be another discussion about it, the lawyers were warned, and this step should be to file sanctions and report them to the bar.
A Colorado judge issued an order disallowing Trump from intimidating witnesses or officers of the court - something that is ALREADY illegal. They're so terrified of putting him in jail for contempt.
https://lemmy.world/post/5553911
Chicken shit judges.
*Edit: there -> they're. Amateur hour over here.
Did you ever think that if different judges with different political ideologies are all doing the same thing, it's because they're all acting professional and not giving Trump room to scream from the rooftops that it's political persecution? They have to take progressive enforcement.
He's being treated with baby gloves because if they actually do punish him for being a fucking moron his base will go nuclear and probably kill people
Ok sure random person on the Internet. I'm sure you're right and this Berkley Law grad is an idiot.
https://law-and-politics.online/@Teri_Kanefield/111086898643982244
https://law-and-politics.online/@Teri_Kanefield/111071366797113729
I would think it is more about not wanting the same rules applied to other rich people. Can't have precedent set for the rich and connected actually being punished for anything, otherwise they might go after other corrupt people, too!
How would a lawyers issue sanctions? You don't even have to read the article to know that, it's right there in the title!
Are you high? FFS.
Neither you nor anyone else downvoting has provided any backup for their impulses... Fuck both your and my emotions, provide facts! Judges issue sanctions, neither sides' lawyers can! If you still disagree, what have I gotten wrong?
Simmer, kiddo. Breathe.