705
Trump Floats the Idea of Executing Joint Chiefs Chairman Milley
(www.theatlantic.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
705 points (96.7% liked)
politics
19144 readers
1358 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Far as I know, there's no law against stochastic terrorism. Hard as it would be to write and enforce, fuck me, this is the real deal.
Hang tight. I'm feeling pretty good he's going behind bars. There's just too much against him, and the offense is as prepared as it has ever been in American history.
If he was being tried in any other district than the one he is in Florida, it would be beyond easy and the trial would be a formality.
But Cannon absolutely can just let him off the hook. That's pretty much his only option left, and if that happens, then there's nothing anyone can do about it.
There's also the DC case and the Georgia case. He's highly unlikely to wriggle out of all three. By this time next year, the Republicans could have a convicted felon as their nominee.
Obama did an extrajudicial killing by drone of Anwar al-Awlaki, a US citizen who was (allegedly) an Islamist stochastic terrorist. Obama also murdered his 16 year old son as collateral damage in the assassination of al-Awlaki by drone. Seems to me there's laws on the books banning stochastic terrorism if you're a Muslim. Also if you're black, see the MOVE bombing and Fred Hampton.
Stochastic terrorism is only legal if you're a white supremacist or a neo-Nazi.
Well, extrajudicial would imply not legal. What you're really pointing to is that when white supremacists are involved, somehow the government suddenly cares about due process and civil rights.
Because those groups have lawyers.