705
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 452 points 1 year ago

This is what happens when you don't bring the fucking hammer down on violent authoritarian fascists. Who has to die to make it clear that this sack of shit needs to be bound and gagged while his trial proceeds?

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 251 points 1 year ago

The fact that he’s still campaigning with ninety fucking Federal charges against him is absolutely absurd.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 140 points 1 year ago

Ninety-one. Accuracy is important.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago
[-] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

It brings the presidential average above 2!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Garland would have to care and treats him and other Republicans with kid gloves. The kid whom leaked documents was insta-prison. Yet Trump sold out the entire country and the DOJ is Zz z.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago

Yeah Snowden is still hiding out in countries that don’t extradite to us. Manning is free, but it’s pretty clear that her time in prison had serious lasting damage to her mind. Both of them had good reasons to leak and did their best to minimize unnecessary damage. Meanwhile this chucklefuck is campaigning and threatening.

If democracy dies it will be because we punished those who broke the rules to strengthen it and defended those who broke the rules to destroy it.

[-] ericisshort@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

That last sentence is so true that it’s chilling.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] orclev@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Playing devils advocate here, Trump has a history of wriggling out of what looked like slam dunk cases against him, and being an ex-president comes with truck loads of political baggage, so the DOJ might just be playing things extra-careful. It would make sense for them to double and triple check everything, dot all their i's and cross all their t's, and make sure everything is as utterly airtight as they can make it. The real danger is that they don't go so slow that the whole thing becomes moot because they took so long that Trump managed to make himself dictator in chief.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] riskable@programming.dev 41 points 1 year ago

That's not a problem. Anyone can campaign at any time. That's totally legal and fine.

What's absolutely absurd is the level of support he still gets from Republicans! He owns them.

If some former Democrat president did this stuff the support from Democrats for that person would be near zero. No one would consider such a candidacy even remotely within the realm of possibility.

Republicans just don't give a shit about corruption. Some will see this statement and say, "no, they care about it when it's not one of their people" but that's 100% the same thing. Corruption is all about picking winners and losers based on what your side thinks of them.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

I mean, we've literally already established that overt corruption "just makes you smart."

This is what republicans are voting for. They are fine with corruption if it means they win.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Yuvneas@kbin.social 86 points 1 year ago

Its crazy how much leeway he is getting. Back during the Bush years a guy in my town had a hang bush sign on a cardboard cutout of him hanging from a tree. The dude was arrested and held for "terrorist threats." The same was not true of similar threats made toward Obama. This was in liberal western Washington. The fascists have always gotten handled with kid gloves in this country and it seriously needs to be addressed if we have any hope of coming out the other side.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 61 points 1 year ago

But if we start punishing rich people for crimes, what's next? Punishing other rich people for their crimes?

[-] Slwh47696@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the only thing the rich truly fear is consequences for their actions.

Daily reminder to fucking kill the rich

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Orange shitstain's record already includes 1M+ Americans dead from his bullshit handling of covid

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Who has to die to make it clear that this sack of shit needs to be bound and gagged while his trial proceeds?

Chairman Milley, obviously. RTFA! \s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] horsey@lemm.ee 173 points 1 year ago

I can’t believe half the country wants to vote for this deranged sleazebag.

[-] omgarm@feddit.nl 86 points 1 year ago

From an outside perspective I have been waiting for years for the USA to go "haha gotcha! We pranked the whole world!".

Please hurry.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

Believe me, when this piece of rancid filth ends up behind bars, most of us will be as relieved as you.

Remember, he only won in the first place because our stupid fucking electoral college system screwed the country. Most of us never wanted him, and can't wait to see him in a jumpsuit that matches his stupid skin.

[-] FederatedSaint@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Believe me, when this piece of rancid filth ends up behind bars, most of us will be as relieved as you.

I won't be relieved, because at that point there will be thousands (millions?) of irate, brainwashed acolytes who are told that he is an innocent political prisoner, and that their country has turned against them, and the only thing they can do is turn violent and become terrorists.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Violent, childish, vindictive, deranged sleazebag

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Conservatives have decided Trump is the person who most accurately represents them.

[-] horsey@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

It’s true, unfortunately. He’s a perfect distillation of Republican attitudes.

[-] ForestOrca@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

The GOP is less than 1/3 the voting population, so your disbelief is understandable and reasonable. The largest voting bloc is independent, by a significant margin. These articles are a bit misleading, as they try to fit everyone into GOP or DEM, but the Gallup poll showed, "Now, political independents (41%) greatly outnumber Republican (28%) and Democratic (28%) identifiers."

https://news.gallup.com/poll/467897/party-preferences-evenly-split-2022-shift-gop.aspx

https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/poll-largest-percentage-americans-independents/

https://www.based-politics.com/2022/01/20/more-americans-identify-as-independent-than-gop-or-democrat-new-gallup-poll/

https://www.axios.com/2023/04/17/poll-americans-independent-republican-democrat

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] ravheim@lemmy.world 137 points 1 year ago

This is yet another example of terroristic threats against federal officials. The FBI really should get on that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatening_government_officials_of_the_United_States

[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Since we're adding wiki articles, this sort of threat feeds into the idea of Stochastic Terrorism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_terrorism

credit to @sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz who posted it before

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] paddirn@lemmy.world 123 points 1 year ago

“Floats the idea”, as if this were just a normal idea that any prospective president might ask around about.

[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All the sanatized language makes me wonder if there's a rule against saying someone is "absolutely out of their mind" in a headline.

"Insane Former President Wants to Execute Military Officer for Personal Reasons"

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TimeSullen@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago

I don't understand how this man is not in prison. This shit is fucked.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Far as I know, there's no law against stochastic terrorism. Hard as it would be to write and enforce, fuck me, this is the real deal.

Hang tight. I'm feeling pretty good he's going behind bars. There's just too much against him, and the offense is as prepared as it has ever been in American history.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

Terrorism is legal in America if you put a (R) before your name.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago

Death thread against a federal employee? And everyone is fine with that?

[-] Colorcodedresistor@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

He just Floated the idea, its not like he actually,um-Quick, Buzz, Biden Jr's Laptop!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

You see silly only when a liberal makes a joke about it is it serious! But it's ok if you're a Republican.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 51 points 1 year ago

Good ol' stochastic terrorism. An almost textbook example.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

So fucking tired of this guy. And the asshat is not even in office. I sure hope this total loser does not "win" again. I'm not sure our country will survive this time.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But Donald Trump, on his social-media network, Truth Social, wrote that Mark Milley’s phone call to reassure China in the aftermath of the storming of the Capitol on January 6, 2021, was “an act so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH.”

What does ”in times gone by” (emphasis mine) mean in this context?

[-] ElusiveClarity@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

He’s doing the old fascist thing of reminiscing about the good old days that never existed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A time that has already passed. The olden days. The before-fore times.

Basically, he is using words that are supposed to sound like he is from Downton Abbey or some shit.

I have a theory that he doesn't write half the shit on his social media site. The same with exTwitter, when he was still on that platform.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago

Has no one told him that what he wants is irrelevant?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nbafantest@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Its a nice reminder of just what the Trump Presidency was actually like. Just pure chaos and impulse.

Exceptionally stressful time for our nation and people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trump ~~Floats the idea of Executing~~ Calls for Volunteers to Murder Joint Chiefs Chairman Milley

fixed it

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
705 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19144 readers
1306 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS