27
submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] uphillbothways@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I read all the theories. All I can muster is 'oh no, not Russia's pipeline.' Seems like however you cut it, Russia did this to themselves by invading Ukraine. They were kind of on a more decent path towards meaningful integration for a minute. Would have been good for common Russians and everyone else if they'd stayed on that path. But, instead their leadership decided on extreme aggression.

[-] zephyreks@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

Didn't German and Dutch companies fund Nordstream 2? "Russia's pipeline" indeed.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Doesn't really matter who paid for it so long as it's intent is to send oil/gas one way and huge amounts of money the other way.

[-] zephyreks@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

It's infrastructure that Germany and the Netherlands funded. Why doesn't it matter?

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Because it wasn't blown up because of who funded it but rather who it benefits most. I'm not saying it's right but it's at least a save thought.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
27 points (63.4% liked)

World News

32327 readers
684 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS