357
submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Huh I didn't know antimatter was a completely confirmed thing.

After making a thin gas of thousands of antihydrogen atoms, researchers pushed it up a 3-metre-tall vertical shaft surrounded by superconducting electromagnetic coils. These can create a kind of magnetic ‘tin can’ to keep the antimatter from coming into contact with matter and annihilating. Next, the researchers let some of the hotter antiatoms escape, so that the gas in the can got colder, down to just 0.5 °C above absolute zero — and the remaining antiatoms were moving slowly.

The researchers then gradually weakened the magnetic fields at the top and bottom of their trap — akin to removing the lid and base of the can — and detected the antiatoms using two sensors as they escaped and annihilated. When opening any gas container, the contents tend to expand in all directions, but in this case the antiatoms’ low velocities meant that gravity had an observable effect: most of them came out of the bottom opening, and only one-quarter out of the top.

[-] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You may have heard of a "PET scan" used in medicine. This uses a type of antimatter called a positron.

https://bigthink.com/hard-science/positron-emission-tomography-antimatter-cancer/

[-] float@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago

The complexity behind this is fascinating.

[-] joelthelion@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just wait until you find out about MRI :)

[-] float@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

That's pretty awesome too, but they don't need molecules with atoms that were modified using particle colliders just minutes/hours before you need them.

[-] joelthelion@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Still much more complex than PET conceptually, and much more versatile.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 year ago

That might be dark matter you're thinking about

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago
[-] BloodSlut@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Not only does it exist, but bananas give off a fair bit of antimatter due to their decaying potassium isotopes.

Allegedly, im not smart enough to verify it

[-] plistig@feddit.de 27 points 1 year ago

Would an anti-banana give off normal matter?

[-] Sargteapot@lemmy.nz 18 points 1 year ago
[-] taigaman@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

I don't think it would antimatter

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Argument anihilated!

[-] 768@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

AFAIK, yes, you might wanna look into β+- and β־-decay

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

AFAIK, yes.

There are some very small differences between matter and anti-matter, but I don't think any of them affect radioactivity.

[-] sushibowl@feddit.nl 21 points 1 year ago

Bananas produce antimatter, but just barely. The main radioactive material in bananas is Potassium-40. A banana is about 0.358% potassium in all. About 0.012% of naturally occurring potassium is the radioactive Potassium-40. Only 0.001% of all radioactive decay events in postassium-40 produce an antiparticle (a positron).

An average banana produces a single positron about every 75 minutes.

[-] Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Brb. Making a fruit-based matter-antimatter annihilation power plant.

[-] Redditiscancer789@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You kid but as a kid when I learned about potatoes and lemon batteries I was like "SCALE THIS UP NOW!"

...if only...

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That’s fucking awesome.

[-] wols@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

El psy kongroo

[-] ekZepp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago
[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

We need a Far Side where ape scientists are colliding two bannanas at high speed

[-] ChickenAndRice@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

They say if you microwave bananas, you will get green gel bananas

^dont ^actually ^try ^that

[-] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 year ago

Antimatter was first observed physically back in 1932. A positron, more specifically. Its existence has been confirmed, and accepted, for ages, and some of our technology already operates using antimatter to do its tasks.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

anti-matter? ya, we have been observing it for quite a while (testing is difficult for reasons), it naturally accumulates in parts of the Van Allen belt.

Dark matter on the other hand is still completely up for question

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

The Large Hadron Collider wouldn't work if antimatter wasn't confirmed.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Because it involves colliding protons and antiprotons.

[-] _Z1useri@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

No, it either does proton-proton collisions or heavy ions, both regular matter. At TeV energies the added energy from anihalating matter with antimatter isn't that much of a contribution anymore that it would justify the added complexity.

Its predecessor collided positrons with electrons though. But the LEP was more for precise refinement of known interactions and not so much about reaching the highest possible energies.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, but it doesn't just collide protons and antiprotons, does it?

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
357 points (99.7% liked)

science

14595 readers
52 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS