103
submitted 1 year ago by tintory@lemm.ee to c/politics@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Especially because they don't actually make that much money from their online store as opposed to Amazon Web Services. That's the behemoth that keeps them chugging along. It should be a separate company.

[-] thepaperpilot@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Well funnily enough I think that part, legally, is totally fine. There's nothing anti competitive about being in two unrelated industries, and I don't think there's a good case that aws is a monopoly. There are viable and cheaper alternatives like hetzner, aws is just popular but it's not manipulating the market

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

I agree, AWS is definitely the largest, but Google and MS are both competing very well in the space for 2nd and 3rd place. On the other hand, no online store front even remotely compares to amazon.com's presence, so it's understandable the FTC would have eyes there.

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
103 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10179 readers
94 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS