251
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by inconel@lemmy.ca to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world

We never know the number of undiagnosed, many may be just capable of pretending but suffering.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I think what OP is communicating is this:

There are dozens (perhaps hundreds) of different mental models. There is a single mental model that is neither good nor bad that appears to to cover the largest number of living human beings on the planet. Because this covers the largest number of humans, it holds the title of the standard by which all other mental models are judged. It is the baseline. "Neuro" being "of the nerves" and typical" meaning "common". It is, by definition, neurotypical.

So OP continues the thought with: Consider instead of the mental model that is today's "neurotypical", that some other mental model was shared by the largest number of living humans. Would that other mental model, which could be drastically different, be called the "neurotypical".

The answer, clearly, is: Yes. Simply the definition of the term defines it so.

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
251 points (88.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

29525 readers
250 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS