2274
submitted 1 year ago by ZWho63@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Year/month/day is superior when reading full dates, because it's the least ambiguous. If I only need day and month, I'd rather use month's full or shortened name (like 27 Sep). Ambiguity is the real enemy here, not any particular order

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 5 points 1 year ago
[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago
[-] pseudonym 2 points 1 year ago

I scanned through this and my takeaway is that it's just defining a formal grammar for iso 8601. Did I miss anything important?

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Kind of. As I understand it, ISO-8601 is also super broad and allows for a bunch of different potential formats and I think durations.

For instance, 2009-W01-1 is a valid ISO-8601 date, meaning 2008-12-31(!) which is pretty weird.

load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
2274 points (98.1% liked)

Memes

45746 readers
1635 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS