190
Japan startup develops 'Gundam'-like robot with $3 mln price tag
(www.reuters.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
190 points (99.0% liked)
Technology
34893 readers
992 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Didn’t they build this years ago? I remember the lame arse “fight” with the US robot company.
yes, like 10+ years ago.
Still a joke, not sure why they don't get a proper hydraulic control person involved in these projects.
I get the feeling that, seeing as hydraulics have been around for longer than robotics, it just isn't practicable to build a robot out of hydraulics - otherwise we'd have them already.
Nah, you can't beat the power density of hydraulics and never will unless room temp superconductors become a thing.
Big Dog from Boston Dynamic was hydraulic.
Going that size or bigger, hydraulics is a must.
The reason you don't see it is hydraulics is a completely different ball game.
Controls researchers stick with small and electronic, because that's what they know.
It's very rare to find a controls engineer that understands hydraulics.
And the hydraulics experts out there, don't have the background for sophisticated control theory.
I'm not sure why you say that. They are not.