153
submitted 1 year ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

As renewable energy becomes more widespread in the United States, large and bipartisan majorities of Americans say they wouldn’t mind fields of solar panels and wind turbines being built in their communities, according to a Washington Post-University of Maryland poll.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

People don't object to them unless they are near them. There's a phrase for it. Nimbyism. Not in my backyard

I think windmills are beautiful, solar panels in fields a bit harder on the eyes, but there's plenty of places to put solar without ruining outstanding areas of natural beauty

[-] MelodiousFunk@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

I'd love it if my backyard (or just beyond it) was a wind farm.

  • Open space
  • No traffic
  • No yappy dogs
  • No Karens/Kevins/Krotchgoblins pretending their backyard is a combination kitchen and living room, filling the air with wood smoke and sportsball shouting on an otherwise beautiful day/evening where I'd prefer to have my windows open and would if there wasn't a perpetual party just outside of said windows (yes this is a very specific complaint and no I would not have thought this was something to be annoyed about until it became chronic and annoying)
[-] Nighed@sffa.community 2 points 1 year ago

The problem is that the people complaining already have that. Companies just want to make it 'worse'.

I don't have a problem with wind turbines most of the time, I think they look cool, I have a bigger problem with power lines. At least they have some new designs here in the UK that are slightly better.

[-] ThatllBuffOut@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

Yep, go north of Detroit and you end up seeing these yokels. Which is really sad since we'd all really benefit from it.

[-] Lawdoggo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Getting out of Macomb County was the best decision I made in a long time. Although I won’t pretend Oakland is much better outside of like 4 cities.

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
153 points (99.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5205 readers
630 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS