122
Report claiming net zero will cost UK trillions retracted due to ‘factual errors’ (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago by anzich@feddit.de to c/climate@slrpnk.net
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If it cost 1000s of 10,000s a month to simply cook food, it would probably not be worth the cost to save the planet. That's how high they expensive they expected wind to be in their calculations.

this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
122 points (99.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5243 readers
256 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net