756
Anon breaks his chains
(sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
756 points (94.8% liked)
> Greentext
7549 readers
1 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Still doesn't look like anything definitive. Words like may and could are littered throughout the article. It looks like the main evidence was a questionnaire.
You do know that honest science rarely makes definitive statements, right? It may be a spurious correlation, but the next most likely explanation is that all the men lied about their results in a way that perfectly mimicked the expected results, and they did so without any coordination, and over the course of years. Or it's just a massive coincidence that is only true of those men.
https://www.health.harvard.edu/mens-health/ejaculation_frequency_and_prostate_cancer