398

The far-right representative has plunged the House into chaos—and turned his own party against him.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 97 points 1 year ago

The growing anger towards Gaetz is unlikely to help him as Republicans weigh whether to expel him from Congress.

Ha fucking ha. No they won't. There's still that weirdo liar Santos. If they still haven't done anything with him, I seriously doubt they'll do jack dandy to teen sex trafficker Gaetz.

[-] Jackolantern@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago

What will it take for republicans to expel one of their own? Apparently child trafficking isn’t it.

[-] Bigmodirty@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Working with democrats or reaching across the isle in any form

[-] arensb@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

This.

McCarthy did the right thing for once, and came up with a solution to the looming shutdown that managed to pass by getting both Republican and Democratic votes. And he got shitcanned for it.

The message here is that as far as MAGA Republicans are concerned, bipartisanship is a firing offense.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

And now Republicans blame Democrats for not supporting him lmao

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

It may have been a no win choice for Dems, but I’m a little worried that we’re gonna end up with a much worse speaker.

Keeping McCarthy would have at least been fucking over Gaetz.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm hoping they're unable to coalesce around another person.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that seems like it’s best case.

Dream case would be the less right reps putting up someone sensible enough for Dems to support.

This predicates a sensible candidate existing, so will remain a dream (and still a shitty one, like dreaming a full day of school just before waking up on a school day).

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

At this point no one knows really. This could also end up being the beginning of the Republican Party permanently fracturing. It seems we get closer to that each day.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think that would have already happened if the moderates thought they’d have any chance at winning elections as a centrist party, but first past the pole voting keeps 3rd party candidates out of contention in most districts. The math is against it happening, or it might have happened back when the dipshit tea partiers arrived.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Parties have died before even under our system, it is possible.

[-] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I hear we're likely to get Jim Jordan. UGH.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Fucking hell. The GOP really loves making pedophiles and rape enablers their leaders, apparently.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I dunno, Boebert got caught on video "reaching across the aisle" with her Democratic boyfriend during Beetlejuice and the GOP hasn't done anything to her.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Well, he did vote with all House Democrats...

[-] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Donating GOP funds to the poor probably

[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Maybe if their constituents actively annoyed them about it for long enough? Far-fetched, but it might just work.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

They have staffers to make sure that doesn't happen.

[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Ain't no staffers got shit on a handful of people with vuvuzela following the representative around whenever they're in public. Rotate the shifts, 1 hour each, and you only need 24 people daily for permanent vuvuzela brrrrrrr heralding their elected official of choice.

I would also enjoy watching a legion of mimes mockingly reacting to representatives in interviews, if the vuvuzela is too 'public nuisance'.

Or both. Both would be great. Public shaming could be a very creative and cathartic outlet.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

They have cops to handle outright harassment. Politicians are the kind of people cops actually look out for.

[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Vuvuzelas and mimes are surely free speech, in the land of the free and the home of the brave. 🇺🇸 /s

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

The Realpolitik of the situation is that if they expel Santos, he gets replaced by a Democrat immediately, who will swim to re-election. Gaetz is in a safe Republican district under a Republican governor, so they can replace him without causing any real problems.

Not to even remotely equate the situations, but it's the same reason why Dems went after Franken and are going after Menendez right now; it doesn't cost them anything to do so. They'd be much less likely to go after someone like Senator Manchin of WV, Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, and Senators Warnock and Ossoff of Georgia unless they were absolutely forced to, since doing so would mean the loss of the Senate.

And it is a genuinely messy question. How heinous an act is worth losing the ability to pass any legislation and make any judicial appointments? I really don't think there is a clear answer to that. A few Senators made the difference between Roe v. Wade standing and falling.

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Breeding fetuses in space, unveiling gender reveal parties, then aborting them to harvest adrenochrome and liquefying the remains to use as a base for COVID shots?

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

It's ok if you're a Republican.

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
398 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2149 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS