214

McCarthy behind move to kick Pelosi out of her office, sources say -- so he can move into it (www.cnn.com)

submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Kevin McCarthy was behind interim Speaker Patrick McHenry’s move to kick former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and former Majority Leader Steny Hoyer out of their office spaces, two Republican sources told CNN.

GOP Rep. Garret Graves told reporters on Wednesday that McCarthy is getting the office that McHenry has ordered her to vacate.

“Look the deal is that the office that Pelosi is in right now is the office of the preceding speaker. Speaker Pelosi and other Democrats determined that they wanted a new … speaker, and it’s Kevin McCarthy. So, he’s getting the office,” he said.

Sources close to Pelosi and Hoyer say it was retaliation for Democrats siding against McCarthy in voting to vacate the speaker’s chair Tuesday. The unofficial offices are located near the House floor.

McCarthy and McHenry’s did not respond to requests for comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

Look the deal is that the office that Pelosi is in right now is the office of the preceding speaker.

If you want to be extremely generous, you could say this is the point. Pelosi is no longer the preceding Speaker, and so if this office is traditionally used by the most recent former Speaker, it'd make sense that she'd have to give it up sooner or later.

However, this

Speaker Pelosi and other Democrats determined that they wanted a new … speaker, and it’s Kevin McCarthy.

as well as moving Hoyer, is how you know it's purely performative whining. The Democrats didn't introduce the resolution to remove McCarthy and they didn't give speeches as to why he should be removed, Republicans did. McCarthy chose to break his deal with the Dems from May and chose to forego any bipartisan help against Gaetz' resolution. This is just the GOP lashing out at the Dems because the 11th commandment forbids them from punishing the members of their own ranks who are truly responsible.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

im not sure of this interpretation as well. usually the last speaker is from the other party so its actually usually a high figure from the other party more akin to a shadow cabinet type of thing. EDITED to explain intention to folks that don't know. In a parliment the minority party has folks in place who would do the jobs of the various ministers if they were in charge. So they sorta shadow the actual ministers. This is so that if a change of government happens they are ready to take on the responsibilities.

[-] candybrie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I think people are taking shadow government the wrong way, hence the down votes. For reference, if you just search shadow government, you get conspiracy theories. If you search shadow cabinet, you get the UK opposition party political structure, which is what I think you were going for.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

yes I meant to refer to the parlimentary usage of it. I will edit it to shadow cabinet

this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023

214 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19097 readers

1853 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News