164
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zenofpython@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is great thanks for posting.
How do you deal with apathy? Like in current political climate in which many people (all?) would decline the lottery?

People could also have lots of reasons to decline. Personal, professional, etc. What were the incentives to accept?

[-] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Well, it's multiple things.

  1. People are paid for their time on the council, and by law the pay is AT MINIMUM 25% more that whatever you were already making, but could be considerably more depending on the pool of eligible citizens. Remember, the pay is the GREATER of 125% of whatever you were already making in your private job, or 200% of the average pay for the eligibility pool. So if you're making $40,000 per year and get called to council, you're gonna get paid a minimum of $50,000 for your term, but if the average pay for your eligibility pool is $40,000, then you're gonna be paid $80,000 for your term. It's structured so that there's always a strong financial incentive to serve.

  2. People don't vote because they feel their vote doesn't matter. When you're part of a pool of 10 million people, one vote is more or less negligible. But, when asked to serve, you're now one of only a handful of votes. Maybe one of 5. Maybe one of 11. But your vote absolutely matters in a way that nobody could dismiss.

And tbh, if somebody declines, it's really not that big a deal. Eligibility pools would be big enough that a nontrivial number of people could decline the position and we'd still have plenty of eligible citizens. Worst case scenario is come kind of coordinated general strike against serving on councils, but to be fair, if the population is pissed off enough to enact a general strike in a meaningful way like that, they would have enacted a Branch No-Confidence movement long ago.

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago

It might be better to make participation mandatory to prevent a ruling class from demoralizing everyone else they way they did here with voting.

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
164 points (89.8% liked)

Asklemmy

43942 readers
649 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS