771
The Moral Case for No Longer Engaging With Elon Musk’s X
(www.bloomberg.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
771 points (87.7% liked)
Technology
59436 readers
1147 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'm not sure I'd call lemmy ethical considering how much genocide denial there is.
I think you missed the part where the person you are replying to is talking about the ethics of the platform itself, not the ethical viewpoint of the users using the platform nor the personal views of the developers.
Platforms don't have ethics. They're software, not people.
Platforms have the ethics of the people administrating them
And designing them. Anything coded has the biases of the people who made them baked in.
Software is shipped with a license. There are licenses that are more or less ethical.
Do I have bad news about twitter... At least no one profits from it here
Lemmy isn't one entity. It's several different websites. That would be like calling Linux unethical because some people use it for weapons research.... it's open source, so people can do whatever they want with it. Douglas Crockford famously added ""The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil" to the license for JSON, but it was determined by various people to be unenforceable and not compatible with free software licensing.
Are we alien denialists too when we want proof of extraordinary claims?