476
Microsoft causes learned helplessness
(lemmy.sdf.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
476 points (81.0% liked)
Linux
48655 readers
1427 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Do you realize that those two goals go hand in hand and are not mutually exclusive? For example, there's no benefit in OS usability to putting out a single line error code as opposed to even the slightest detail as to what went wrong. That's not "making their products easier to use to attract customers" as there's not a single person in existence that judges an OS on how little they have to know about an error.
That's mystificatiom of the system.
While it's true that an overall goal of a company like ms is to sell more operating systems, that doesn't mean that learned helplessness isn't in the syllabus somewhere.
Regardless of what a message box says the majority of people are gonna have to Google the issue.
Linux powerusers have a meltdown when trying to comprehend that there exists a middle ground between power user and complete idiot, I guess - which leads to small essays saying nothing at all to people who will blindly agree with it no matter what it is says because it's anti-corporate / anti Microsoft.
Ok, but the solution to "lots of users don't know the difference" isn't "we might as well show so much less that we reduce the entire problem to a nondescript code that can mean several different things"
There's literally no reason to do that except to discourage people from solving the problem in the first place, because the users you're referring to won't do it either way.
I don't get why this is a controversial opinion?