383
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2023
383 points (99.7% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7233 readers
364 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
The judge should make the dept pay her. How is this not the automatic result? I know, don’t explain it to me. I’m just mad.
Yeah, the money's not gone. We know where it went, and there was no actual crime related to the money.
Civil forfeiture is state-sponsored theft.
Don't worry about silly things like rights. You have no rights and no property if the proper authority arbitrarily decides you don't.
"Rights don't exist if someone can take them away" - Carlin
Can't most departments seize for feds and get a cut in return, state civil asset forfeiture is getting less common because it's getting easier to fight because it's more known and everyone thinks it's idiotic.