395
submitted 1 year ago by zephyreks@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

The right to smoke and be unhealthy.

Also bodily autonomy. That kind of action, if accepted, could be used to impose incremental bans on anyone for any reason, so long as the majority is authoritarian enough to agree.

Like access to hormones for trans people. Or abortions. Or birth control. Or weed.

[-] Corporate_Hippie@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago

Oooohhh the right to smoke and be unhealthy... yeah that's not a right.

[-] RegularJoeJoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Oh but it is. It is your autonomous right to duck yourself up. It's not healthy or smart and your peers will push back at your decision. , but it is your right! Fuck this authoritarian "we will decide what you can and cannot do"

[-] Corporate_Hippie@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Oh but it just isn't. Tobacco is a controlled substance in pretty much every country in the world. Now you may disagree as to where this government is being too restrictive and that's fine, but it doesn't mean you have any inherent rights to consume tobacco. The same way you don't have a right to consume heroine or meth.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
395 points (92.5% liked)

World News

32317 readers
687 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS