32
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
32 points (94.4% liked)
Fediverse
28226 readers
467 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'm pretty sure that would not be in Meta's best interest, from their point of view. After all, Meta is all about harvesting your personal data. I believe whether to federate or not will come down to how egregious the federation terms are that Meta will propose because you know they will want to access user data in some fashion for their own profit. If they want the same kind of data from the Fediverse as they get from their native app, the answer will be a resounding "no". If they ask for even 20% of that data, the answer will remain the same.
If things played out in just the right way, this could push them away from the Fediverse entirely, I'd think. Seems it would be hard to monetize any traffic coming from the Fediverse end of things, which would make the whole thing more of a headache than it's worth for them.
An instance that was explicitly set up as a read-only backdoor to Threads probably wouldn't stay federated long, but is a cool idea at least.
I don't know, they could be using the federverse as content provision. They get better data on all their users based on where they go and what they see on the federiverse.