412

Donald Trump's Israel Intel Leak Under Scrutiny After Hamas Attack (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Donald Trump's sharing of alleged classified intelligence to Russian officials in the White House has come under scrutiny amid a large-scale attack by the Hamas Islamist military group against Israel.

In May 2017, the former president defended his actions after he was found to have discussed sensitive details about an alleged Islamic State (ISIS) plot with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Ambassador Sergey Kislyak in the Oval Office. Trump said he had an absolute right to do so. The intel was said to have been provided to the U.S. from Israel.

It was suggested at the time that the former president's handing over sensitive information from Israel could have damaged the relationship between the two countries. It also could have raised the possibility that the details could be passed from Russia to Iran, the Gulf nation that is a fierce adversary of Israel and has long supported Hamas.

On Saturday, Hamas, designated a terrorist group by the U.S. and the European Union, launched a large-scale attack against Israel, resulting in the deadliest day of violence in the Israel-Palestine conflict for decades. More than 700 people have been killed in Israel, and a further 400 in Gaza, since the incursion by Hamas, according to the Associated Press.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] oDDmON@lemmy.world 107 points 1 year ago

Still, a third of the country wants him back in the oval; proving once again, the power of propaganda.

Looking at you, Fox.

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 45 points 1 year ago

They don't even know why they want him, aside from spite for anyone else.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Because he's the only Republican with a chance of winning. Which is damn pathetic.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

To own the libs. That’s about the extent of it.

[-] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Last time, they literally ran "make liberals cry again" as a campaign slogan.

I'm not talking about random Trumpsters - this was spread by the Trump campaign itself.

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I saw a news clip of some woman being interviewed who said he was gods messenger.

[-] unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

It’s disturbing but I think it’s more than a third… other than organized religion … there is no bigger cult.

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023

412 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19145 readers

1674 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News